RESEARCH ARTICLE


Experimental Comparison Between Three Types of Opaque Ventilated Facades



Francesca Stazi1, *, Giulia Ulpiani2, Marianna Pergolini1, Daniela Magni1, Costanzo Di Perna2
1 Department of Materials, Environmental Sciences and Urban Planning (SIMAU), Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
2 Department of Industrial Engineering and Mathematical Sciences (DIISM), Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 2819
Abstract HTML Views: 1447
PDF Downloads: 587
ePub Downloads: 438
Total Views/Downloads: 5291
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1228
Abstract HTML Views: 812
PDF Downloads: 402
ePub Downloads: 273
Total Views/Downloads: 2715



Creative Commons License
© 2018 Stazi et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Materials, Environmental Sciences and Urban Planning (SIMAU), Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy, Tel: 0039 071 2204783, Fax: 0039 071 2204378; E-mail: f.stazi@univpm.it


Abstract

Background:

The growing interest for the energy efficiency of building technologies has led the construction sector towards the adoption of Opaque Ventilated Facades (OVFs) as high-performance solutions for building systems.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to determine the optimal thermal inertia of the outer surface of ventilated facades with respect to the indoor comfort and the reduction of the outdoor overheating.

Method:

An experimental study was carried out in Central Italy (Mediterranean climate), by comparing the thermo-physical performance of three opaque ventilated façades, characterized by different positions of the mass (hollow bricks) within the air cavity. One has no mass and is enclosed by a Lightweight (L) cladding; one has an Internal Mass (IM) right adjacent to the insulation layer and an external lightweight cladding; the last one has an External Massive cladding (EM). The three prototypes (L, IM and EM walls), were installed on a test room and simultaneously monitored in the summer season.

Result:

The experimental outcomes demonstrate that the EM wall outperforms the others in terms of cooling efficiency, as the incoming heat fluxes towards the indoors are considerably reduced. Moreover, such a configuration led to the lowest surface temperatures on the outer slab, thus contributing to the mitigation of the external environmental overheating.

Conclusion:

Overall the External Mass (EM) solution was found to be the best choice, being beneficial for mitigating the outdoor surrounding temperatures and enhancing the buoyancy-driven ventilation.

Keywords: Ventilated façade, Energy performance of buildings, Experimental study, Ventilation channel, Thermal inertia, Summer cooling, Temperature distribution.