Reviewing Construction Schedule Float Management

Jyh-Bin Yang*
Graduate Institute of Construction Engineering and Management, National Central University, Taiwan

Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 5681
Abstract HTML Views: 1516
PDF Downloads: 805
ePub Downloads: 329
Total Views/Downloads: 8331
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 3055
Abstract HTML Views: 968
PDF Downloads: 660
ePub Downloads: 237
Total Views/Downloads: 4920

Creative Commons License
© Jyh-Bin Yang; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (, which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the No. 300, Zhongda Rd., Zhongli District, Taoyuan City 32001, Taiwan (R.O.C.); Tel: +886 3 4227151 ext. 34040; Fax: +886 3 4257092; E-mail:


As the complexity in construction projects increased, simply managing the obtained float values and critical path(s) by the CPM method usually results in more difficult schedule control and, consequently, in incorrect decision making due to non-realistic float values. This study thoroughly reviewed various float types in the literature and professional project management systems, and discussed five managerial essentials and three proactive strategies on mitigating challenging float-related problems based on the perspective of managing schedules by controlling floats. With some comments and suggestions, the outcomes of this study not only improve the knowledge level on schedule management but also provide a better understanding of float management to improve the quality of schedule management.

Keywords: Critical path method, Float management, Float, Project management, Review research, Schedule management.